Valentin Vacherot vs Daniel Michalski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Michalski and Vacherot compare in second serve points won recently? Michalski has a slight advantage with a 44.35% win rate, just edging out Vacherot's 44.14%.
• In returning second serves, Vacherot outperforms Michalski, winning 46.45% compared to Michalski's 43.85%.
• Michalski boasts a better win rate in returning first serves, achieving 29.87% against Vacherot's 27%.
• When facing breakpoints, Vacherot has been more resilient, saving 51.27% compared to Michalski's 45.82%.
• Michalski and Vacherot have similar match win rates over the past year, winning 63.51% and 61.36% of their matches, respectively.
• What are their best-performing surfaces? Michalski excels on clay with a 65% win rate, while Vacherot is at his best on hard courts, winning 72%.
• At the tournament level, Vacherot outshines Michalski, winning 63.33% of matches in Challengers/ITF tournaments compared to Michalski's 50%.
• Vacherot has faced opponents with a higher average ranking (295.18) than Michalski, who has competed against players ranked around 398.01 on average.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Michalski appears stronger, winning 67% of such sets over the last year; Vacherot has won 59%.
• Michalski shows better breakpoint conversion, succeeding in 35.53% of opportunities against Vacherot's 28.24%.

Editorial Prediction (August 1, 2025, UTC):

While both players display competitive strengths, their recent performances provide crucial insights into likely outcomes. Michalski demonstrates stronger ability in converting breakpoints, which could be critical in tight moments during the match.

Michalski also excels on clay surfaces, suggesting a surface advantage if the match is played on such a court. Additionally, his higher percentage of wins in deciding sets over the past year showcases his resilience under pressure.

Vacherot, however, has been playing against slightly stronger opponents on average, and his superior performance in returning second serves and saving breakpoints indicates a robust defensive game.

Considering these factors, Michalski appears to have a slight edge heading into the match, suggesting he is the likely winner.